Thursday, July 29, 2010

Schrödinger's Litterbox

In 1935, Austrian big-brain physicist Erwin Schrödinger developed a thought experiment that has since seeped into public awareness in recent decades because it's totally far out, man. Largely without complaint from animal rights groups, curiously.

 

The original thought experiment called for a steel box in which are placed a cat, a quantity of a radioactive substance, a Geiger counter, and a death trap. Originally the death trap was a vial of hydrocyanic acid that is triggered to spray in the box when the Geiger counter detects sufficient decay of the substance. Later versions of the story called for a shotgun to blast the box, which I actually think might be more humane.

 <!--more-->

This hypothetical experiment illustrated the phenomenon of quantum superposition as described in the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox: without opening the steel box you can't know if the kittycat has been murdered by the acid, or if it's still happily snoozing.

 

What's totally far out, then, is that the cat is both alive and dead until the moment the box is opened. Only when the box is opened and its condition observed does the superposition collapse into one definite state, and at that point the cat becomes either alive or dead for real.

 

When I was told this story as a teenager, I was totally like whoa. The universe suddenly seemed just a little more magical and far out, and the complex relationship between observation and reality, which fascinated me already, became even more awesome. I imagine there are scads of bright minds out there, young and old, for which this story created a sense of wonder and awe.

 

It's sad to realize that this completely misses the point of the story. Schrödinger used this story to poke holes in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics (and not to simply illustrate it) by inventing a situation that would produce superposition, but which is obviously nonsense. Cats obviously aren't both alive and dead. Trees that fall in the forest do make a sound, and bears shit in the woods all the time.

 

I know, it was a huge disappointment to me, too, when I learned this, but we owe it to ol' Erwin to recognize what he was trying to tell us. We weren't supposed to be totally like whoa, we were supposed to realize that cats are either alive or dead, and that therefore this superposition stuff was rather suspect.

 

The universe, alas, is perhaps a little less wondrous now. But take heart: this was in 1935. Much has been learned since then and with the construction of truly awe-inspiring machines like the Large Hadron Collider, more is being learned and supposed and debunked every day. There may be even more radical realities for us to marvel at.

 

I just hope they're not illustrated with lolcats.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Rocking Little Asian Drummer Boy


http://www.youtube.com/v/aJG9Tol1a0U&hl=en&fs=1


By the middle of the song the kid is having SO much fun. And holy hell he's good. Look at him go! :)

The Not Writer - audio edition

Yowza, the time does fly! About a year ago I wrote a series of posts on the topic of the Not Writer which was quite well-received, and since I'd just bought a decent condenser microphone on a super cool hinge arm over my desk I immediately set about recording that seven-part series, edited it together... and, well, kind of forgot about it after that.


For your enjoyment, here's the full 30-minute reading of The Not Writer!





  
Download now or listen on posterous

The_Not_Writer.m4a (15155 KB)


Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Spot the differences: Erasing a car from Maranatha through the magic of Photoshop.

Testing out the Content-Aware Fill in Photoshop CS5 on a little section of an image from Heathen City 3 by Alectorfencer. AMAZING. See how many differences you can discern! Also, testing out a new blogging app for iPad, so pardon any awkward formatting or obnoxiousness :) 



Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Sex, Guns and Storytelling



Sex and violence, like romance and suspense, are just ingredients. Not every meal requires every ingredient you enjoy, and some are actually damaged quite severely by the introduction of ingredients that have no place there. Mrs. Cropley's famous peanut butter & anchovis sandwiches are an example. On the other hand, sometimes strange combinations work amazingly well -- the first time I encountered mustard ice cream I just had to have a second helping.


With Heathen City #2 I wanted to deliver an extremely rich and diverse narrative and opened up many cans of wiggly, creepy little plot-worms. Exposing some of Malloy's activities prior to Owen's arrival. Showing the very beginning of Tony Caulfield's character, and his mother's, and then reveling in those carefree days when The Boys had the whole world at their feet -- and the introduction of Tiber Ferrum, swathed in mystery. I strove to weave a colorful tapestries with tons of blank spaces in it, spanning large expanses of time and intimating deep enigmas, speaking of bloodlines and creating patterns of behavior that indicated, through their contrast, the unexplored presence of substantial events between them.


However, this introduced a crucial flaw: distraction.<!--more-->


While I'm very satisfied with each story and tremendously proud of each arc's final form, especially the enormous creative influence and expression of the awesome artists who brought them to life, and while I feel that the structure of the arcs combined creates a framework wherein the stories that explicitly aren't told are almost as interesting as those that are, there was just too much going on for the reader to bond with the second book as much as they had with the first.


The through-line of the book was implied rather than expressed, and while I do love to make my readers work to figure out what they're looking at, the book as a whole didn't make it clear what the reader should care about and what they should take away at the end. Every story an sich was tight and had a clear arc, and they were thematically, emotionally and causally connected, but it needed just a bit more continuity for the reader to connect more fully with the characters.


I love the modular structure of the second book. It has obvious benefits for production, since illustrating a full comic is a taxing job for any artist, let alone when they have day jobs and studies and a way-too-dense script from a persnickety and overambitious writer. That Ayato was able to do it for the first book still astonishes me.


Writing shorter, denser scripts with a strong arc presents its own challenges and forces me to be economical, constantly compressing the plot, excising that which doesn't contribute enough, no matter how cool it might be on its own. Every beat, every gag is examined over and over to ensure it serves a functional purpose: establish peril, heighten suspense, misdirect attention, relieve tension -- and the stories are stronger for it.


I'm certain it's possible to combine the advantages of each approach, and I'm confident Heathen City Vol. 3 will demonstrate that. Modular stories by different artists for intense, highly-polished storylines with a mouthwatering variety of styles -- but still bound by continuity, tightly related, to preserve the reader's investment as they weave through the plotlines. Where HC2 might be discribed as an anthology, HC3 is an ensemble piece.


So this time around I even more closely evaluated the merit of each plot element, each scene and each character to strike a balance between the thrill of discovering new or previously-hinted-at aspects of this universe, and making sure the reader at all times knows what to care about, and carry that investment through to the end of the book.


And that means there wasn't a place for nice, juicy, indulgent sex scenes like those in the first two books except for just one, to establish a new character in the context of this morally ambiguous and hedonistic world. At the same time, the sex itself, the exchange of bodily fluids and the nature of procreation suggest a particularly maudlin preoccupation of this character that's only very gently hinted at.


There were two -- maybe three, at a stretch -- beats where I could have slipped a sexy interlude, and perhaps a year ago I might have done so simply because they would have been delectable scenes, but my assessment this time around was that their presence wouldn't benefit the story as much as their absence. They'd break the urgency and suspense, they'd trivialize the danger and emotional challenges the characters are facing.


Now, you know me. I think sex is just super and I love having it, and thinking about it, and seeing it and writing it, so this certainly doesn't mean I'm turning into a moral snob overnight. Heathen City is for me as much as it is for my audience and if I'm going to invest years of my life and thousands of my hard-earned Euros I'm going to make damn sure the result is a story that I want to read more than anything else I could pick up at a con!


And I'm going to make sure, with every chance I get, to make my audience feel the same way.





- Alex Fucking Vance

Friday, January 29, 2010

These are a few of my favorite things


There is beauty in this world, old and new, and while it may be argued that nature's paintbrush is more graceful than Man's chisel, I have a love for Things People Made.


In this post I'd like to talk about the appreciation of objects in their utility and elegance, the sensations they inspire and the impact they have on our lives. Materialistic? Certainly, but we're a tool-using species and a fascination with objects is what elevated us from the mud.


Tools, buildings, ornaments, furniture, clothing. These are the vestibules of humanity, artifacts through which anthropologists can glimpse the spirit of bygone civilizations, and by which we can judge the nature of modern-day cultures as well.


<!--more-->


This Wednesday, January 27th, saw the announcement of the iPad. As a media and print enthusiast, small-press publisher, typography and New Media nut (not to mention Machead) I was understandably excited and followed my usual tradition for such Apple events.


The keynote speech by Steve Jobs would start at 7PM my time so, coming home from work, I immediately sequestered myself in my home office (my boyfriend is the understanding sort), popped up four browser windows side-by-side and launched a different live blog feed in each of them, after which I spent the next two hours reading the reporters' quick posts  typed into their laptops and squinting at blurry photos they took on their phones during the event. I twittered furiously, and although I understand the lunacy about live-tweeting about an event I was 'witnessing' only second-hand, at least 'twittering' in this case isn't a metaphor for self-abuse.


As a media and print enthusiast [etc] I have many opinions about iPad. Many expectations were dashed, some surprises blew me away and it's a good thing the device won't be sold for another two months, because I'd like to be able to form a coherent opinion on it before I inevitably break down and buy one. Until then, however, my mind is on Things. And here, now, is a List Of My Favorite Things.



My iPhone 3G, purchased on the day it launched in my country during a midnight sale in Rotterdam where I was accompanied by two good friends and my younger brother + entourage -- and which, I might add, turned into quite the rocking late-night street-party -- is a Thing which I enjoy immensely. Other than Jimminy Willikins, no object spends as much time in my hand as my iPhone. I enjoy the physicality of its interface, the depth to which the interactivity model has been thought through. The sophisticated simplicity of the design, seamless, and its weight. It stands proudly in its cradle on my work desk.



On my desk right now is also a Moleskine notebook. I've never written in it, though I have ones at home that are worn and filled and bulging with stuff stuck into them. My penmanship has always been rather poor and my mother never prepared me better for my adult life than when she sent me to typing classes at age ten, but nevertheless I've always enjoyed the linearity of writing by hand and the way that process guides the mind.


So even though I'm nearly fully digital, I still love the Moleskine for its functional design. Small-signature binding so it lies flat when opened, rounded corners to prevent fox-ears, off-white paper and faint lines, a harmonica fold to stick loose items into, a bookmark ribbon and an elastic  to keep it closed. Useful, portable writing perfection, justly legendary, so when I found an old blank one at home I brought it to work and just left it on my desk as an ornament. I like it, why shouldn't I keep it around?


It's not all about looks, though. The very best pen I ever used wasn't a thing of beauty per se. It was a cheap translucent plastic home brand rollerball with blue-black ink that cost a euro and a half when it was still manufactured. Tastes vary of course, but for me, for my chickenscratch handwriting, it was perfection. The rollerball nib glided smoothly over the page with just enough friction to keep my letters succinct and in control. The ink spread richly, dried quickly and struck a gorgeous contrast against the cream paper, sustaining its beauty even years later.



My very favorite book, growing up, was my favorite not so much because of its subject (though it was a fascinating read), but rather because of its substance. The book in question was Hyperspace by Michio Kaku, and purported to continue where Stephen Hawking's book A Brief History of Time left off. Through historical accounts and anecdotes Kaku illustrated the lives of some of the greatest thinkers in the history of science and guided the reader through the complex and abstract curiosities of theoretical physics. The sophisticated science was accessible because Kaku explored the life and mind of the thinker to illustrate the nature of the thought.


It was the book itself, the material object, that kept me going back to the library to fetch it. A library hardcover, converted through lamination from a softcover, it had a very satisfying thump to it when knocked or set down. Apparently this copy suffered some form of damage, and that's what gave it such allure. The pages were off-white, a soft ocher-cream, discolored at the edges with a more cinnamon tint. The lettering was well-balanced and crisp, and printed with an overabundance of magenta so that the print, while ostensibly black, always seemed a gorgeous and regal red out of the corner of my eye.


Best of all was the smell. I've never experienced its like. Whatever happened to this book suffused it with just the faintest scent of sulfur, like a freshly-struck match. Undetectable for the first few minutes of reading, I didn't even notice it until the second or third time I read the book, but once I realized I understood what it was that intoxicated me so. Even years later, the pages retained the scent.



The Mac computers I've owned, culminating in the current 24-inch iMac on my desk, were a heady blend of industrial grace and software sophistication. Glossy white or matte black plastic composites, black glass, brushed aluminum all carved into shapes that spoke of thought and insight and the thorough understanding of an under-appreciated and oft-mocked facet of the human psyche: emotional connections with things that aren't alive.


I'm not talking about such curiosities as moe, but rather the way that every experience and observation interacts with our state of mind, to the point where we endow the inanimate with emotion and value just as surely as we do people. A workman comes to value some tools highly as they serve their function well, a soldier appreciates his weapon and his uniform. There's no one source for this attachment, though the context of the object's relationship with its owner is certainly a large part of it. A wedding ring is a prime example; the thing is meant to be beautiful but the (hopefully) happy association makes it all the more spectacular.


We can complain about the materialism of modern society, the excess and the idolatry, but we mustn't forget how innate these qualities are. We value things as ugly or beautiful, clever or ridiculous, and we bond with some of them in silly or heartwarming ways. This is who we are, and I, for one, am not embarrassed.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Let's help Senator Conroy get Aussies off the Internet!




Dear Senator Conroy,






As the subject of internet safety is as hot a topic in the Netherlands, my home country, as it is in yours, I have closely followed the progress of your fabulous efforts to protect Australia's children from the exigencies of the modern World Wide Web. While I applaud how close you're coming to restricting the internet activities of your country's citizens, I have some serious concerns about the possible flaws in your plan. First and foremost: despite your laudable efforts, I have personally observed that there are still a few Australians on the internet, and I'd like to highlight some of the ways in which the exclusion of Australia from the datasphere could be more effectively achieved.



As you were born in England, Senator Conroy, I sincerely hope you see yourself as the 21st-century champion of your nation's colonial policy of 'convictism' in which the quality of the English population was markedly improved by dumping all the undesirables on the then-newfangled continent of Australia. The inconvenience this caused the Aboriginal People is a lamentable tragedy, and I'm pleased to see you're using more modern means to achieve the same goal without causing undue stress for others.



<!--more-->



However, I cannot voice my full support for your plan as it seems a bit on the wishy-washy side. As it's currently proposed, with the technology that's currently been prepared for the live field trial later this year, this plan of yours will do nothing to 'protect Australia's children', i.e. 'protect the world from cyber-savvy Australians'.



Before I go into details, though, let me first say I have absolutely no objection to your use of this program to also provide a service to the citizens you represent! Coming from such disadvantaged stock — criminals, musicians, civil engineers, sluts (I'm looking at you, Mary Wade) and some Irish — they're understandably threatened by complex subjects such as sex, euthanasia and drugs. The Australians are as horrified by the Netherlands' excesses in these matters as we are by the fact that Australians pronounce every sentence as if it's a question...?



There's no harm in solving both problems at once, I can't help but wonder if perhaps you've 'gone native' since you moved to Australia and have lost sight of the bigger picture. You've shown such strength, ignoring the protests of internet rights groups, protest marches, the recommendations of the ISPs who must ultimately implement your plan and the majority of your own senate, but I find myself disappointed that you fail to go that last mile that would truly achieve internet security from Australia.



When you claim that the internet filter has, in tests, proven to be "100% accurate" you're being blatantly deceptive. Of the internet filter technologies you tested last year, those that were able to effectively filter as much as four out of five harmful sites (requiring Australian internetters to click up to a dozen times to circumvent the filter and access the porn), the filters also blocked at maximum 60 000 out of every million other webpages. That means there's still 940 000 sites where Australians can continue to use words like arvo and fair dinkum and strewth. This does almost nothing to protect us!



You've booked more impressive results with the impact of the filters on internet speeds. One of the more promising technologies you tested out was able to slow the users' internet speed by 20% even when it wasn't filtering, with some others providing up to 86% slowdown during actual use! This is a measurable success, Senator Conroy, as this should effectively prevent Australians from uploading YouTube videos about surfing.



But does it stop them from social sites like FaceBook or LiveJournal, where the majority of the content is text-based? Even 24% of modern internet speeds would still enable your country's citizens to bother the rest of the world with opinions, information and meaningful dialogue.



Happily, though, I see that you do have a solution for this. The Australian Communications and Media Authority will, in your plan, maintain a blacklist of sites deemed 'objectionable' and the looseness of the terminology you've consistently used in defining your plans fills me with confidence that this is where you'll compensate for the technical shortcomings I highlighted earlier. Having given no indication of how a 'public complaint' against a particular site will be reviewed, nor established any means by which the blacklisting of a site could be appealed, you've cleverly guaranteed the AMCA the ability to chip away at the information space with which Australia can interact, severing that digital umbilical one strand at a time.



My last concern, though, is about the length of time that it will take to completely isolate your country from the internet the rest of us use. Let me assure you, Senator Conroy, that I will do my part to expedite the process! As the writer of fiction for adults, I'll be sure to advertise on as many sites as I'm permitted to so that you can blacklist each of those for containing 'objectionable material'.



Further, I'll encourage everyone I know to engage in discussions about sexual health, drug dependency, unwanted pregnancy and the suffering of the terminally ill so that you have ample fuel to ensure that any site frequented by wholesome, upstanding citizens of the rest of the world can be protected from the involvement of Australians.



Your detractors have bandied the tag #nocleanfeed on Twitter, and created slanderous websites such as www.nocleanfeed.com to feebly protest the march of progress you're staunchly championing. To them I say:



#GetAussiesOffTheNet



With passionate, abiding affection,



Alex Fucking Vance



PS: I included the F-word in my name at the bottom of this letter; could you please ensure that my site is added to the blacklist at your earliest convenience?